|
prani07 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
beautiful
crawhip2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
from my understnding ...the 'probability of finding this point particle ' IS through the wave...but why did he not say 'wave function'?isn't he supposed to say 'wave function'?
goerizal (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
what made Bohr think of and assumed the presence of well defined electron orbits around the nucleus which allowed further acceptance of the atom concept then? was this simply fudging to make things seemingly fit preconcieved ideas or was this derived from some verifiable mathematical computations-was this just a thought experiment that was serependitious? thanks.
tmmylopez (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So when we die do we die forever and nothing more?
underfaker43657 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is beautful
lambricklion (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Can anyone tell me what video this clip is from?
leftysg18 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
But that's all it is...just a probability...not an exact point in space and time.One physicist(forgot the dudes name sry) once said "You can compare looking at an electron to looking at a cat. There is a probability that the electron is in that point in space or not in it, similar to the probability that the cat you are looking at is dead or alive."
darkknightgaury (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No. You can measure the position of the electron. You can use the bohr model for hydrogen like atoms. But you need the wave function in order to calculate what is the probability of an electron being in some space.
Plasmon19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well, certainly you may think so but it is still strange how an electron can be in two places at the same time. This phenomena has been observed, it is not about the position of an electron it is about the nature of the electron itself...Wave particle Duality.
Retsam19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
We have technology to measure the position with great accuracy :D |
