uchihaakall (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I believe what he did is real there is such thing as chi its ur chakra the entire universe is energy we eat food it gives us energy this guy knows how to control his energy and extract it to one point an use it as an element like he set that paper on fire that was some crazy shit i duno why people are saying this guy is bullshit becuz any video u see on youtube wont show you 100% proof u wont believe it until it's done infront of you

ClearFire1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thanks for keeping the meditation technique a secret asshole!

twohseven (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

ALL of this phenomenon John Chang demonstrates and talks about in this video - as well as much more as he is only scratching the surface - is not only ancient and once common knowledge, it is solidly scientific (let's not confuse scientific with narrow-minded rational ignorance) in nature and provable by means of active observation and first hand experience. For one to question what humans are capable of is nothing new, but for one to claim that something like all of this impossible - absurd.

twohseven (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

well people must wake up to what/who we are.

waluum (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is not meant to be seen. This video should not have been made, much less posted. It's privileged information, and is not to be watched as entertainment.

djnross (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Medical phenomena exist,not all are hoaxes.But there is not one non-hoax structured Western Investigative methodologies cannot unravel so as to disqualify it from the preposterous stigma of "miracle".----"structured",that is....

djnross (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

In Science there are hypotheses sound enough to withstand the 7 crucibles without the likelihood of collapse but for the detraction of one or two theoretical,minor,components.The existence of the hadron,and other similar subatomic particles ,for example.Humean skepticism,in its strictness,would suggest such inductions to be but "butterfly-chasing".But even Hume was flawed.

reaperofgenocide (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I get what youre saying.

lennyhipp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Now Im more interested in the "certain" and "he doesnt say "god doesnt exist"" part."Because he's smart enough to know that even without evidence there's still a miniscule possibility that a god exists. (I'm talking about sir richard dawkins btw) He's as sure of certainty as he's been certain about anything in his entire life. Like being certain the sun will rise tomorrow. There's always a possibility that it wont... but you wouldn't go around saying "the sun might rise" would you?

lennyhipp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Because mysteries are so intriguing.."yes, but interesting mysteries require investigation, and shouldn't beget faith!"You cant prove it, you wont win a debate on pure fact or science. But its compelling.":) i would use interesting instead of compelling, but okay, wont beleaguer the point. As far as can't prove it, the onus of proof lies on the one making the claim. Proofs don't exist outside of mathematics. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as Sagan said.