|
newnamedanyy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i love this car
chromebomb (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
is this the first supercharged audi engine?
stillclaimndp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ive owned 2, and 24 other cars, and trust me it is FAR from the best engine ever made LOL. Terrible gas mileage, big V6 performance, you must be off your rocker.
matthew860 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The old V8 was one of the best engines ever made
stillclaimndp (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The old V8 was mediocre at best, lacked torque, lacked excitement, i have had 4 x twin turbo B5 S4's and 2 x B6 V8's along with a 2007 e92 335i BMW and the B6 is good, but far from great. Glad they did away with it.
halomolim (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree. I really do not know what the hell Audi was thinking by getting rid of the BEST ever created, naturally aspirated V8, from the last RS4. They may perhaps want to go down the Ferrari/Porcshe lines, by creating a 3L engine that puts out 350hp. I personally believe that S4 and RS4 sales will plummet, and that many RS4 enthusiast, like my self, will shift the focuse onto the new M3. RS4 was better thatn M3 and now, it is the other way around.
112namrepus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah when is the RS? I Want the RS5 to have the lambo V10 and 600 HP. It looks so good in deserves more than 360 HP.
citi0rhythm (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
add to rudolphna54, since supercharger is driving by really the engine directly, so theres not lag from the the point u step on the gas and when the turbo creating boost from the exhaust gas, the supercharger give more instant response but will tend to create less boost compare to turbo chargers
rudolphna54 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Turbo driven by exhaust gasses, supercharger driven by the serpentine belt
mstt1010 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Whats the difference betwee, (Turbo charger and supercharger) |
