ProducerJOJOHO (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If we had not redefined marriage back in the late 60s then Blacks could not marry whites and latin and asian etc...! Thank God our country can redefine marriage to include everyone! EVERYONE

ApoIogetics (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

how does the gay adgenda affect anyone? Ex.1"As a Black woman," Dixon wrote, "I take great I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims.' Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a black woman. I am genetically and biologically a black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended." University of Toledo President Lloyd Jacobs immediately suspended Dixon and condemned her statements. Within days, Dixon was fired.

songunkilla (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

haha "my mom is hella gay!" thats just gold!

crazymonkey77 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No, I'm not saying it's part of the Constitution, just that it should be.And what's more, they should be able to get married under a judge, eh? Don't you think?Also: Adding extra capital letters does not, in fact, make you seem more informed or more important. And while I'm pointing out grammatical mistakes in that particularly nitpicky way I have a tendency to do, it's "separate", which is somewhat odd, given it was spelled out for you in my post.

ApoIogetics (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Crazymonkey77Seperation of church and state is not in the constitution. Look it up for yourself. Oh and ITs the government that is getting pushy with the church. Taking a religious Ceremony.Marriage, and trying to make it legal for samesex couple.SO if you want to go by that term. Then the State needs to be seperate from the church and stop shoving Change down their throatSimple Enough eh?

yobru33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

wow ur not cool

crazymonkey77 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Ooooh, I like that argument. I normally stick with the "whatever menstruating women touch is unclean" one myself, because I personally think that one's friggin' hilarious. These people need to learn what "separation of Church and state" means, eh?

yellfireforlove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hahaha, funny.

yellfireforlove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yes, taking away someone's rights is wrong." Until nov. 4th same-sex marriage was legal. And it was taken away. and then you said "complaining about extra rights, redefine marriage" What extra rights? explain that. And redefine marriage? whatever do you mean. It is a joining of two people in love. How is that redefining. Because then 40 years ago we redefined marriage also... Now its Common Sense.

progay (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

A clear majority of California voters has spoken. The California constitution must support what's in the bible. Leviticus and Deuteronomy are clear: "And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not eat; it is unclean unto you." Now that the gay marriage question has been taken care of, it's time for the rest of the bible. Let's get shrimp out of our state. Think about it - do you want your kids to be taught that it's OK to eat that which hath not fins or scales?