talligalli (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

very good!i don't know nothing about itinteresting

pegbars (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Oh, wow. Yes, this is incredibly patronizing.

4a8p9x (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I agree with you ButThenAgain: This is the most patronizing display I have ever seen. The only DISRESPCTFUL thing here is the producer's disregard for the intellect of the deaf.

FatherBrain (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

At the very least, she should have gotten Gandy's species right. She consistantly refers to him as a duck, and Gandy Goose is, well, a goose!

fromthesidelines (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This one features the team of Gandy Goose (another of Paul Terry's "superstars") and Sourpuss...and it looks like a low-rent retread of "Porky In Wackyland" [1938] and "Dough For The Do-Do" {which was released earlier in '49}...and "Dingbat" earned his own short-lived series because of this! The "interpreter" should have mentioned Gandy and Sourpuss by name...

TarHeelBri (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I'm a 20-year old male and I am hard-of-hearing... there needs to be more interpretation in movies! It's easier to understand and I graduated college!

showmeasign (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thanks! My son loved it!

showmeasign (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

HOW COULD YOU BE SO DISRESPECTFUL???? Deaf children need to see posative examples of ASL and for your information my Deaf child with a high IQ happened to love it!

aleniboy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

fishfishfriend, if they were trying to cover blind children why would they need an ASL interpreter!??

fishfishfriend (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Maybe they're trying to cover the blind children at the same time??