|
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
RETARD is correct, NIST explains "collapse innitiation"Trouble is they didnt prove it.Their own data destroys the theory, which lives and dies on steel temperatures.Did Nist proceed to Model the entire collapse of two scrapers in the worst Terrorist Attack in US History??NOPE.
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
OCTrs cling to Grandiose statements like "engineers the world over" & "vast amounts of evidence"They're all bunn and no burger.FACT; Nist did not prove the collapse was caused by steel failure due to heat.THAT'S ALL BURGER BITCH!
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey Retard tell us at what point the fires began to cool?Tell us how much jetfuel was detonated on impact?Tell us you've read the report yourself because you sure don't sound like you have.LOL OCTrs are such total loosers!
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Unfortunately for your Sorry Ass, I have read the pertinant sections of the NIST report concerning steel temps. NIST;"No steel was found to have exceeded 600C for any significant time"NIST; Only three steel samples of 140 inspected from the impacted areas was found to have exceeded 250C.Critical steel elements did not fail due to heat.This is obvious to anyone whos read into this report.All you have is your statenment that it is a proven theory. OCTrs cling to repeated lies.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Your "evil Gubmint" didnt produce the NIST report, scientists and structural engineers did and their findings are freely available for comment from other structural engineers across the world.Funnily enough, the structural engineering community worldwide, agrees with NIST.Maybe you think that watching a few youtube videos of the collapses makes you more knowledgeable?
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"the Nist report, an unproven theory which they admit doesn't explain the collapses (which they refuse to model)"Wrong, it explains exactly how the collapse initiation occurs and is accepted by the whole of the worldwide community of structural engineers.Have you even bothered to read it?
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The evidence is written all over your face man.You wouldn't be here if there wasn't any.Start with your little Bible, the Nist report, an unproven theory which they admit doesn't explain the collapses (which they refuse to model)OCTrs liker you will insist the NIST Report is a proven document,There's just one problem.YOU CAN'T PROVE IT.So run along & get yourself a nice Hot tasty bowl of Government Bullshit,, that's what you live on.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thats better, you sound all grown up now, psychospammer.Any chance you want to actually produce any evidence that 9/11 was an inside job?Its been long time now...
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"You seem really bothered by my moniker psycho spammer.Hits a raw nerve doesnt it?" - RetardedwhateverListen to this unoriginal dweeb repeating after me ~LOL~ it's no wonder he feeds on predigested information.Rockon Followers.
PsychoSpammer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Shut yrr stinking freekin' Kiddy pen peekin' mouth, Jizzhole. |
