|
azx01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Continued:Re: IfYourMomWereATacoCalling her a 'slut' is completely out of context if you consider how she is being portrayed in this video.Offensive to your religion in the slightest, but keep in mind there is a big difference to this and Charlotte Churches new video. Clothed or not, one can be more offensive with clothing sometimes.
azx01 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There is a difference between nudity of the female body as being portrayed as beautiful in itself, an art form needing to be respected and NOT as an object of desire from the male standpoint.
heidim1942 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its music from schubert and lyrik von walter scotts" lady of the lake " is not catholic thema !beautiful song and beautiful singer of a feminine form whats problem ? go inquisition go !
stevotts (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Most likely she will burn in hell for this one...but if not, she is a real lowlife.
IfYourMomWereATaco (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you dumbass. do you have any idea what "Ave Maria" means? never mind the actual text, all you have to do is look at the title to know that this is a sacred piece. HAIL MOTHA-FUCKIN MARY. in case you don't know who mary is, that would me the mother of jesus, the messiah, yaweh, christ, the saviour of mankind... the foundation of the entire christian denomination. this is sacrilegious. she's a slut with no talent disgracing all that is music and religion.
glamorouskinalways (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ders nothng wrong about nudity..but everything at its proper place and time. sure they had another theme or plot in mind in scoring and delivering the song...it is an indifferent version of respectability and spirituality.this is not a fight for what is right or wrong.we share opinions and need not bicker.true, do not judge, haven't you?...opinions are cool but those who react to them are not. you all have lovely inputs but pls dont spoil d brainstorming.peace!
crumbuzz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Rasp.
husat77 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm not offended by nudity or the idea of a nude religious figure, but this video is very self-serving and nothing more than selling sex. The significance of the song and her ability to beautifully sing it take a back seat to exhibitionism. I'm not a Christian, but I'm just as offended by her blatant salesmanship as others might be by her disrespect.
PubliusAfricanus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nudity bad! Child rape good!Make up your minds, folks.
624787John (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I might think this was just a bit of bad taste that she might later regret, but I have seen her dolled up as if she was the Blessed Mother for concert numbers. She is probably Church Of England and I know they dont see Mary Mother Of God as Roman Catholics do, but a TAD of RESPECT would be nice from her. |
